In order for members to understand how AFTRA and S.A.G. arrived at two very different contracts covering work on Network Television and in new media, it's important to understand the events leading up the current split between the two unions.


For almost 30 years there has been a joint bargaining agreement between S.A.G. and AFTRA called Phase I. 

Under this agreement S.A.G. and AFTRA have jointly bargained the TV/Theatrical contract and Commercials contract approximately every three years.

The joint negotiating committee has always consisted of 13 voting S.A.G. members and 13 voting AFTRA members.

Over the years, a number of  S.A.G. negotiating committees have expressed their concerns that this system was unfair because it did not proportionally divide the votes based on the jurisdiction of each union.

For example, under the Commercials Contract, AFTRA covers approximately 5% of commercial work while S.A.G. covers approximately 95%.  (AFTRA has a 50% vote on this contract.)

Voting patterns have been consistent over recent years with AFTRA committee members tending to vote unanimously, while S.A.G. committees have had clear majority opinions but also dissenting points of view expressed by some committee members.

Under the Phase I system, therefore, it could take as little as one S.A.G. committee member, voting with the AFTRA members of the committee, to outvote the majority of S.A.G. committee members.

In an attempt to correct what was perceived as an imbalance, the S.A.G. National Board voted to implement Bloc Voting.

Under this system, AFTRA and S.A.G. would have continued their 50/50 relationship in joint bargaining but the majority of AFTRA voters would have counted as one vote (or bloc of votes); the majority of S.A.G. voters would also have counted as one vote (or bloc of votes.)

The worst-case scenario under such an arrangement would have been a stalemate between the two unions, but the integrity of each union's point of view would have remained intact, and one voter would not have the power to impose the will of one union over the other.

Bloc Voting was passed by S.A.G.'s National Board but was withdrawn after objections were made by AFTRA.

Proportional voting was then suggested by S.A.G. to cover all contracts based on jurisdiction.  AFTRA and S.A.G. currently share approximately the same percentage of contracts in basic cable scripted programs and interactive projects, so it was proposed that they share negotiations in these areas as 50/50 partners.

In the area of Network Television, however, where AFTRA had only 3 contracts and in motion pictures where AFTRA had none, it was proposed that the votes of the S.A.G. Negotating Committee members be given proper weight to fairly represent the amount of work covered by S.A.G. under the TV/Theatrical contract.

AFTRA objected to this plan and it was withdrawn.

Both unions then agreed to negotiate the TV/Theatrical contract covering Network TV and Motion Pictures under the Phase I agreement (again with 13 members on the negotiating committee from each union.)

Joint  W&W Meetings were held by the two unions and joint proposals were unanimously agreed upon by the AFTRA/S.A.G. negotiating committee.

During this time period, the cast of the soap THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL had decided to seek a S.A.G. contract to cover their show (which had always been under AFTRA's jurisdiction.) 

The cast members met with S.A.G. leaders but were told that S.A.G. could not and would not participate in any decertification efforts.

The joint boards of both unions were scheduled to meet and vote on the  proposals of the joint negotiating committee, but on the day of the meeting, AFTRA leaders suspended Phase I, claiming that S.A.G. had tried to seize jurisdiction on THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL.

Susan Flannery, the star of THE BOLD AND BEATIFUL (since the show's inception in 1987), has publicly denied that S.A.G. leadership had anything to do with the efforts of the show's cast and has stated:

"LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT…NO CAST MEMBER OF THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL HAS BEEN SOLICITED BY ANY DIRECTOR OR ELECTED OFFICER OF SAG TO LEAVE AFTRA AND JOIN THEM......PERIOD"



Her letter is printed in its entirety below.

S.A.G. began negotiations with the AMPTP (representing networks and studios) and asked AFTRA to return to the Phase I agreement.

AFTRA declined and began separate negotiations with the AMPTP.

On three subsequent occasions, while both unions were in the process of negotiating with the AMPTP, S.A.G. asked AFTRA to return to Phase I and all three invitations were declined.

S.A.G. subsequently asked AFTRA not to conclude negotiations until S.A.G. had also finished negotiations but this request was denied.

AFTRA concluded its negotiations with the AMPTP.

The AFTRA contract was passed by AFTRA's membership with an historically low 62.4% approval rate.

S.A.G. negotiations are still on-going.

LETTER FROM SUSAN FLANNERY

April 14, 2008

To the members of S.A.G.:

LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT!
" NO CAST MEMBER OF THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL HAS BEEN SOLICITED BY ANY DIRECTOR OR ELECTED OFFICER OF SAG TO LEAVE AFTRA AND JOIN THEM......
PERIOD"

The sequence of events is as follows.
Shortly after the first cast discussions of leaving AFTRA, Bill Thomas and David Brisbeis ( AFTRA ) called me & asked if there was any substance to rumors of a petition for descertification.
That was NO PETITION since we didn't even know we're required to have one.
Talk about  being "Babes in the Woods".

I explained to Bill and David that we were only in the early stages of discussions. I gave them my word of honor that we would meet with AFTRA before any final decisions were made.

David and I have a long union relationship, so I felt comfortable that he would take me at my word. I also informed them that we would meet with SAG.

There were 3 or 4 phone calls over the next 2 weeks between us about these matters, including a request for a copy of the contract between AFTRA and B& B  and setting a meeting with AFTRA.

The cast subsequently did in fact meet over 2 evenings with Roberta Reardon and Kim Roberts Hedgepath.

Just so everyone understands, the idea of exploring the possibility for a new 'Collective Bargaining Agent"
began with me.

There has been over the past 21 years at B&B, a growing dissatisfaction with AFTRA regarding health plans, residuals, pensions, meal penalties, turnarounds etc. In the final analysis, the contracts negotiated on our behalf over the years, in our opinion, have fallen very short of our expectations! 

Because we still live in a democracy, and have choices, more internal meetings with the cast took place, and the decision to begin exploratory conversations to seek a different Collective Bargaining Agent began in earnest.

As members in good standing with Screen Actors Guild, my Co-Star ( of 21 years ) John MCCook and I met with SAG National Director Doug Allen & SAG President Allen Rosenberg to ask what our options were.

We did not, as has been reported, complain bitterly about AFTRA.
We only wanted to know if it were possible for SAG to take us into the fold. However, reality quickly interverned. Doug informed us and rightly so, that any complaints we had regarding AFTRA should be brought to their attention by us.

We acknowledged that, and informed him that we were in the process of setting up meetings with AFTRA for just that purpose.

However, we were already in our minds beyond that point.  We never approached this issue out of anger, we simply felt we needed, in the larger view of things, a more focused, stronger, and realistic approach to the changing world of television, and the industry as a whole as it is affected by new media.


Now to the issue of who is truly putting the brakes on our ability to pick the union we choose to represent us.

THE AFL-CIO and their part in all of this.

According to the AFL-CIO, there is a " side bar" agreement that prevents a group of union workers in good standing from leaving one union and going to another without  suffering a 2 year suspension ( waiting period ) before their union of choice can accept them.

Talk about an ANTI UNION clause!

This agreement withholds from union members the protection of a union shop and
collective bargaining agent of their choice..... in this case SAG.

When was this agreed to? When was this issued and why?

Why would anyone vote to support, and or accept this concept?

A cooling off period ? The National Labor Relations Board and their 42 DAY waiting period provide that caveat.

42 days to cool off and re-think, before making a final decision to  decertify.

So we have to ask? What is the real agenda for the AFL-CIO in imposing that 2 yr Waiting Period?

Does this not create a genuine hardship for union members?

Has this, among other issues, created an atmosphere and perception amongst union workers that they are not best served by the AFL-CIO?

It seems that as movements continue to grow, the institution becomes more important then the members it represents. Is that what we and other unions affiliated with them are experiencing with the AFL CIO?

I called John Sweeny in Washington, DC twice to discuss this rule or regulation and even to plead for a waiver, and he has yet to extend the courtesy of a phone call.

It is time to accomplish something positive and meaningful for the working actor in their affliations with Labor Organizations.

" Freedom of Choice" is a good beginning.

Who we choose to represent us, and our best interests, should be up to us!

Susan Flannery

 

Jump to TOP

This website and MembershipFirst are neither endorsed by Screen Actors Guild nor paid for with SAG funds.